Hundreds Cycle Across New York for Mesothelioma

Hundreds Cycle Across New York for Mesothelioma

Four hundred bicyclists from across the globe took part in the 400-mile Cycling the Erie Canal Tour in mid-July to raise awareness for mesothelioma, a cancer caused by exposure to asbestos, says R News.

The sixth annual ride lasted eight days, beginning in Buffalo, N.Y., and wrapping up in Albany, N.Y.

While there is no known cure for mesothelioma, family members of those suffering from the disease hoped the tour would raise awareness.

“We think of them (the victims) in their best ways, in their best moments,” said Bob Good, who lost his sister and brother-in-law to the disease last year. “Doing some things that are positive and upbeat is a great way to capture the spirit they had, that they gave to everyone they came in contact with.”

What recommendations has the federal government made to protect human health?

What recommendations has the federal government made to protect human health?

The federal government develops regulations and recommendations to protect public health. Regulations can be enforced by law. Federal agencies that develop regulations for toxic substances include the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Recommendations provide valuable guidelines to protect public health but cannot be enforced by law. Federal organizations that develop recommendations for toxic substances include the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).

 

Regulations and recommendations can be expressed in not-to-exceed levels in air, water, soil, or food that are usually based on levels that affect animals; then they are adjusted to help protect people. Sometimes these not-to-exceed levels differ among federal organizations because of different exposure times (an 8-hour workday or a 24-hour day), the use of different animal studies, or other factors.

Recommendations and regulations are also periodically updated as more information becomes available. For the most current information, check with the federal agency or organization that provides it. Some regulations and recommendations for asbestos include the following:

  • The federal government has taken a number of steps to protect citizens from exposure to asbestos. First, on July 12, 1989, EPA established a ban on new uses of asbestos. Uses established before this date are still allowable.
  • Second, EPA has established regulations that require school systems to inspect for asbestos and, if damaged asbestos is found, to eliminate or reduce the exposure, either by removing the asbestos or by covering it up so it cannot get into the air. In addition, EPA provides guidance and support for reducing asbestos exposure in other public buildings.
  • Third, EPA regulates the release of asbestos from factories and during building demolition or renovation to prevent asbestos from getting into the environment. EPA also regulates the disposal of waste asbestos materials or products, requiring these to be placed only in approved locations.
  • Fourth, EPA has proposed a limit of 7 million fibers per liter on the concentration of long fibers (length greater than or equal to 5 µm) that may be present in drinking water.
  • Fifth, FDA regulates the use of asbestos in the preparation of drugs and restricts the use of asbestos in food-packaging materials. NIOSH has recommended that inhalation exposures not exceed 100,000 fibers with lengths greater than or equal to 5 µm per m³ of air (0.1 fibers/mL). OSHA has established an enforceable limit on the average 8-hour daily concentration of asbestos allowed in air in the workplace to be 100,000 fibers with lengths greater than or equal to 5 µm per m³ of air (0.1 fibers/mL).

Additional sources of information about asbestos are the 10 regional offices of the EPA. Most EPA regional offices have an asbestos coordinator.

This information is provided courtesy of the ATSDR Information Center.

How can asbestos affect children?

How can asbestos affect children?

Asbestos exposure in both children and adults may occur while breathing air in or near buildings (public or private) containing asbestos building materials or near asbestos-related industrial operations. Children breathe differently and have different lung structures than adults. It is not known if these differences may cause a greater amount of asbestos fibers to stay in the lungs of a child when they are breathed in than in the lungs of an adult. Children drink more fluids per kilogram of body weight than adults and can also be exposed through asbestos-contaminated drinking water.

Eating asbestos-contaminated soil and dust is another source of exposure for children. Certain children intentionally eat soil, and all young children eat more soil than adults through hand-to-mouth activities. Historically, family members have also been exposed to asbestos that was carried home on the clothing of other family members who worked in asbestos mines or mills. Breathing of asbestos fibers may result in difficulty in breathing, lung cancer, or mesothelioma (another form of cancer associated with asbestos exposure).

These diseases usually appear many years following the first exposure to asbestos and are therefore not likely to be seen in children. But since it may take up to 40 or more years for the effects of exposure to be seen, people who have been exposed to asbestos at a young age may be more likely to contract these diseases than those who are first exposed later in life. In the small number of studies that have specifically looked at asbestos exposure in children, there is no indication that younger people might develop asbestos-related diseases more quickly than older people.

Developing fetuses and infants are not likely to be exposed to asbestos through the placenta or breast milk of the mother. Results of animal studies do not indicate that exposure to asbestos is likely to result in birth defects.

This information is provided courtesy of the ATSDR Information Center.

Prince William & Kate Middleton Shine a Light on Asbestos Abatement

Prince William & Kate Middleton Shine a Light on Asbestos Abatement

When I hear “major renovation,” I think of dust and hammering for months. This is likely what’s going on as part of the overhaul of the five-bedroom apartment at Kensington Palace in London, where Prince William and his new wife, Kate Middleton, will soon settle down.

However, first thing is first. Along with significant updates (the last renovation of the apartment was 1960), “Early indications suggest that large quantities of asbestos will have to be removed, as well as work on the heating and hot water systems and electrical wiring. The extent of the work needed to turn the apartment back into a home is not yet known, but it is expected that the apartment will not be ready for occupation until at least the middle of 2013.” This was a statement made to People magazine.

The presence of asbestos in William and Kate’s future home is gaining worldwide attention, especially given the rumors swirling about regarding the possibility that Kate is pregnant.

Back in 1960, during the last major renovation of Kensington Palace, asbestos use was widespread and nothing controversial. In fact, asbestos was the material of choice for flooring, ceiling tiles, and insulation for the Palace.

Back then, asbestos was a first choice as a material due to its heat and fire retardant properties. Before 1980, in construction projects and products manufactured, asbestos was incredibly popular.

Now, however, with the Palace renovation, many more people are learning about the importance of proper abatement and containment of this lethal substance.

Back in 1960, during the last major renovation of Kensington Palace, asbestos use was widespread and nothing controversial. In fact, asbestos was the material of choice for flooring, ceiling tiles, and insulation for the Palac

One Response to Prince William & Kate Middleton Shine a Light on Asbestos Abatement

    • kate says:

      nice and informative post…you can get more here at http://www.mesotheliomatipguide.info

Peritoneal Mesothelioma Cancer Widow Speaks Out

Peritoneal Mesothelioma Cancer Widow Speaks Out

A New Jersey widow, who recently settled for an undisclosed amount, spoke out about the death of her husband. According to court records, Randy Veraldo worked from 1978-85 as a parts handler at a Teterboro, N.J., warehouse. The job required him to unpack nautical clutch plates delivered on a near-daily basis from various suppliers. The clutch plates were said to contain asbestos, a mineral once widely used in the U.S. as a cheap insulating material but now known to cause.

Ms. Veraldo filed her lawsuit as the executrix of the estate of her late husband. He died in 2009, seven months after being diagnosed with periotoneal mesothelioma cancer.

An important takeway from this is the fact that someone who lost her loved one to a slow, but deadly disease found justice — even after many years of exposure at work to asbestos.

2 Responses to Peritoneal Mesothelioma Cancer Widow Speaks Out

    • BSK says:

      New blog on latest scientific findings about Mesothelioma:
      http://asbestos-mesothelioma-research.blogspot.com

    • Mesothelioma says:

      First i want to say sorry to Ms. Veraldo for her husband because it is a big lose and she deserve the rights.

Recyling Company Sentenced to Pay Over $500K for Asbestos Dumps

Recyling Company Sentenced to Pay Over $500K for Asbestos Dumps

A recent Wall Street Journal article reports that Eagle Recyling, a New Jersey recycling company was sentenced to pay a $500K criminal fine and over $70K in restitution & cleanup costs. It was found dumping thousands of tons of asbestos contaminated construction debris in Central NY.

The company pleaded guilty earlier this year and agreed to comply with environmental laws.

According to the charges and plea agreement, Eagle Recycling and other co-conspirators engaged in a multi-year scheme to illegally dump 8,100 tons of pulverized construction and demolition debris that was processed at Eagle Recycling’s North Bergen solid waste management facility and then transported to a farmer’s property in Frankfort, N.Y.  Eagle Recycling and other conspirators then concealed the illegal dumping by fabricating a New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) permit and forging the name of a DEC official on the fraudulent permit.

2 Responses to Recyling Company Sentenced to Pay Over $500K for Asbestos Dumps

    • Dijani says:

      An exposure such as this would be no more dangerous than smoking a single cigarette and, as with fags, Its continued exposure to asbestos which is hazardous to health. If your neighbour has removed this material without using the correct procedure their property is likely to be contaminated and you should advise them to get an air test carried out.

      http://breastcancertreatments.3dl.us/

      Blessings…

    • Skip Bin christies beach says:

      A work mate linked me to this website. Thank you for the resources.

No Knowledge About Mesothelioma Until It’s Too Late

No Knowledge About Mesothelioma Until It’s Too Late

Asbestos related illnesses such as mesothelioma are particularly insidious because people often do not realize that they have the disease until decades after their exposure to asbestos. The severity of illness depends on how long the person was exposed and the amount inhaled.

Last week, the estate of a former New Mexico railroad employee sued BNSF Railway alleging wrongful death, due to asbestos exposure, of locomotive repair shop worker Santiago Riley. During 13 years of employment from 1942-1955 at railroad facilities in New Mexico and Arizona, Riley made locomotive repairs, performed various shop duties and swept floors around dusty asbestos-containing substances without any respiratory protection.

This exposure caused permanent injury and contributed to his eventual death, according to the lawsuit filed by his children. The estate seeks damages for mental and physical suffering, lost wages, medical bills and other financial losses.

An important takeaway of Santiago Riley’s story is that he and his family did not learn about his mesothelioma for years after this employment at BNSF.

Mesothelioma patients generally do not demonstrate symptoms of this disease until 20 to 50 years after their initial exposure to asbestos. Fibers that embed in the tissue surrounding the body’s internal organs, the mesothelium, usually must be present for many decades before the development of cancer. These fibers gradually accumulate and cause scarring, which leads to inflammation and cancer. Although these fibers are most often introduced into the body through inhalation, the material can also be introduced through ingestion as well. Initially, symptoms may be mild and an individual might not find them cause for alarm. However, as the cancer spreads, these symptoms become more severe and debilitating.

8 Responses to No Knowledge About Mesothelioma Until It’s Too Late

    • Gallbladder Cancer Symptoms says:

      If you are going for most excellent contents like I do, only pay a quick visit this web page everyday because it presents quality contents, thanks

    • car insurance says:

      I am regular reader, how are you everybody? This post posted at this web site is genuinely good.

    • Posted by My Industrial Injury Claims.com says:

      I read this piece of writing completely regarding the comparison of newest and preceding technologies, it’s awesome article.

    • Gallbladder Cancer Symptoms says:

      For hottest information you have to pay a visit the web and on the web I found this web page as a best site for latest updates.

    • gabriela says:

      Good luck ,Great post,y love you!Thanks for the info it had cleared out too many things in my mind. Your recommendations are really good.
      http://www.mesotheliomalawsuitsstore.com

    • gabriela@mesotheliomalawsuits says:

      Good luck ,Great post,y love you!Thanks for the info it had cleared out too many things in my mind. Your recommendations are really good.

    • hardwood floor installation says:

      I’d like to thank you for the efforts you’ve put in penning this blog. I really hope to check out the same high-grade blog posts from you later on as well. In truth, your creative writing abilities has motivated me to get my very own site now 😉

    • short term loans says:

      Howdy, I do think your website might be having web browser compatibility problems.
      Whenever I look at your web site in Safari, it looks
      fine however when opening in I.E., it’s got some overlapping issues. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Besides that, wonderful site! no teletrack payday loans

EPA Pushes for Tougher Standards for Asbestos Cleanup

EPA Pushes for Tougher Standards for Asbestos Cleanup

According to an Associated Press article, we may soon see tougher standards in place for federal cleanup of asbestos contamination. The proposed standard emerged after the EPA’s analysis of a Montana town revealed that even the smallest amounts of asbestos can result in lung problems. In Libby, MT, the Environmental Protection Agency concluded that trace amounts of asbestos dust had killed hundreds of people. To rid the area of that dust, the standard would need to be 5,000 times stricter than the standard used for previous cleanups.

A proposed standard for federal cleanup of asbestos contamination in a Montana town concludes that even a tiny amount of the material can lead to lung problems – a benchmark far more rigorous than any in the past and one that the industry says could force expensive and unnecessary cleanups across the country.

The Environmental Protection Agency’s new proposal for the northwest Montana town of Libby, where asbestos dust has killed hundreds of people, would be 5,000 times tougher than the standard used in past cleanups addressing airborne asbestos.

The Government Accountability Office has said the cleanup standard could impact about 200 or so industrial sites in 40 states that also received asbestos-tainted vermiculite from Grace’s Montana mine. More than 20 of those sites, posing the highest health risks, have already been cleaned once. Most of those were processing plants where the mineral was heated at high temperatures so it could expand and be used for insulation in millions of homes.

The GAO and asbestos experts said the EPA risk assessment could force more cleanups. And Grace representatives and health officials said the EPA proposal could apply to other types of asbestos found in communities across the country.

While companies such as Grace may understandably want to resist higher cleanup standards, the Fed’s focus is on curbing the number of asbestos related deaths and injuries.

Asbestos/60 Million Pounds of Debris Illegally Dumped On Farm

Asbestos/60 Million Pounds of Debris Illegally Dumped On Farm

If you had 60 million pounds of debris with asbestos, where might you look to offload it? How about a farm? Better yet, how about one with wetlands and a river that runs through it? That way, the asbestos could soak through the wetlands and flow through the land via the river.

60 million lbs of construction debris dumped farm in Frankfort, N.Y. [Photo: Dept of Justice]

Well, that’s what Cross Nicastro and Dominick Mazza decided to do. Nicastro is the owner of a 28 acre farm in upstate New York. Mazza was an owner of a waste management company. Both got convicted earlier this month and face prison time and big fines. The debris was originally from a New Jersey industrial shredding machine. Asbestos was never removed from the debris.

Assistant U.S. Attorney General Ignacia Morena stated that the defendants had “flouted numerous federal laws designed to protect Americans from exposure to toxic materials when they dumped asbestos-contaminated waste into an area that included sensitive wetlands”  in a statement.

European study finds drug effective in treatment of mesothelioma

European study finds drug effective in treatment of mesothelioma

Reuters reports that the COX-2 inhibitor Celebrex, usually prescribed for arthritis, has a marked effect on the asbestos-related cancer malignant mesothelioma in lab and animal experiments, according to a report from Italy.

Highlights of the report included:

Current treatments for mesothelioma have failed to alter its dismal prognosis, the authors comment in the International Journal of Cancer, but one selective COX-2 inhibitor has been shown to stop mesothelioma cells growing in a lab dish.

This prompted Dr. Alfonso Catalano at the University of Marche in Ancona and colleagues to assess the effects of Celebrex (a.k.a. celecoxib) on experimental mesothelioma.

Celecoxib and similar compounds all inhibited proliferation of a mesothelioma cell line without inhibiting the growth of a normal mesothelial cell line, the researchers report. Celecoxib was the most effective of the agents tested.

“These results provide the first evidence that celecoxib is effective for the prevention and regression of malignant mesothelioma cells in experimental models … and strongly support ongoing clinical trials in malignant mesothelioma patients,” the team concludes.

About Kevin
Kevin Coluccio was recently named one of the Top 10 Super Lawyers in Washington State. He has long history of successful asbestos law cases and has a stellar reputation for getting result sfor his asbestos injury cases.